|
|
Post by truthseeker too on Oct 28, 2003 9:03:23 GMT 10
after last nights debacle the beautiful judge said "if you want your choice to win you must vote for them". last night the guy and paulini voters relaxed which led to their low tally. come on australia don't drop the ball again. the winner will soon represent australia. neither cosima or shannon would impress them in the least. there is too many as good and better. this is not the case with guy he is gifted and world class. the judges must be more assertive in their critiques but no more controversy as it's counter productive and far too late for that.
|
|
|
|
Post by astounded on Oct 28, 2003 9:22:07 GMT 10
i could not agree more. paulini should still be there.cosima must have a lot of relatives. you are right about the judges. thet were too easy on cosima where has their toughness gone?
|
|
|
|
Post by Z on Oct 28, 2003 9:27:02 GMT 10
This competition is about whose supporters are committed enough to keep on voting and spending 50c per vote (or however much it might be).
As Dicko said, it is about (his record company) "spending a lot of money on someone who can sell a lot of records".
If supporters of Guy and Paulini hold back spending 50c a vote at a crucial stage like this, then, they are unlikely to go out and buy their CDs when they eventually come out.
Paulini had been in the bottom 2 before. Her supporters had been warned. It was not enough to keep them committed. That demonstrates a weak (un-committed) fan base.
It was the first warning to Guy supporters, and we will see how they fare in the coming weeks.
Before AI, Paulini won a similar TV contest (Star Struck) a few years ago. Her career did not go anywhere then. If she could not make most of it then, I doubt if she can this time round.
|
|
re all of the above
Guest
|
Post by re all of the above on Oct 28, 2003 10:04:02 GMT 10
yeah but this may teach guy voters a lesson. c'mon
|
|
