|
Post by tot started it on Oct 28, 2003 16:51:10 GMT 10
truthseeker has been working his butt off for guy and you barb flaunce along and without any research kick him in the balls. as he said there is a lot at stake for the dedicated guy fans. who are a stouter bunch than most and committed.
|
|
barb johnny come lately
Guest
|
Post by barb johnny come lately on Oct 28, 2003 16:59:22 GMT 10
how many postings have you got? ?
|
|
|
Post by Z on Oct 28, 2003 17:19:48 GMT 10
Truthseeker...
I never said the finalists are all "equally marketable". I said they have all cleared the pass mark in the singing talent category. Suppose the pass mark is 50. Some finalists may be rated at 90, and others may be at 55. Still, as long as they clear the pass mark, today's recording technology can make them sound superb.
Tell me. Do you really think being a good performer / singer is enough to sell CDs? There are many, many talented people out there. Some make it in this industry, and others don't. And the level of talent or performing ability is not always the deciding factor. Take it from me. I have worked in the industry (not in Australia, though).
About Centrebet... Millsy was their first favourite. Then, they switched to Cosima. Guy became the top favourite only after Millsy left (probably because they thought all Millsy fans would direct their vote to Guy).
|
|
|
Post by z mate on Oct 28, 2003 17:41:49 GMT 10
i saw your point immediately. i'm not talking comparative i'm talking superlative. stop trying to simplify it. he is the silk purse need i state whose ear the others belong to. re centrebet. the odds change with the money. guy was 2.05 then into 1.85 BEFORE monday. today he is 1.70 s and c are3.50 shannon is the shortener and as my mate "frags" calls him kareoke shannon. check under THE PUBLIC...... i respect your opinion and the right to have it. my major concern is we will stuffffff it up. you should have an ear for talent and the ability to cut to the chase with your background. how do YOU rate them 1/10.
|
|
|
Post by TOT on Oct 28, 2003 19:10:36 GMT 10
Bloody hell! You are such an insecure prick!!! How many posts have you now had a go at me in subsequent to my last post?!!! Get over it man - let it go!! If I started it, as you allege, then you are undoubtedly perpetuating it which is worse. ...all because of the word "naive"...sheesh!
|
|
|
Post by the truthseeker on Oct 28, 2003 19:59:51 GMT 10
sorry tot. i was alluding to your implication that the show was about dollars, not naievity. you won't hear anymore about it. the fact is i have been dealing with intellects lower than yours on another programme. i thought if you could dish it out you could take it. i apologise for that comment the king. etc. yours sincerely.B.J.REID.NOOSA.QLD>
|
|