|
|
Post by sinisterangel on Jan 6, 2004 20:57:45 GMT 10
did ya all Noe (i just found dis out today) dat guy got food poisening from some curry he ate ova dere in london dats a reason y he says he didn't really perform well he says dat he had to have doctors up to his apartment    i dunno if its true but it says it in a lot of magazines aswell...... poor guy and if its true den dats wierd coz he performed perfectly well. |
|
|
|
Post by Swizel on Jan 6, 2004 23:10:34 GMT 10
excuses excuses  |
|
|
|
Post by random on Jan 7, 2004 10:41:55 GMT 10
Even if that is true, he performed perfectly fine. I cetainly didn't notice a difference.
|
|
|
|
Post by AfR0EmBrY0 on Jan 7, 2004 11:28:44 GMT 10
excuses excuses Errr.. i don't think he is using it as an excuse!... i think he is just saying that he ate some bad curry! |
|
|
|
Post by sinisterangel on Jan 7, 2004 17:39:14 GMT 10
i noe he did perform very good there was no difference wit him at all but the thing is that it has two things like in one it was hot gossip and it says it was after the performance like one day before catching a plane home and in another place it says b4 his performance so i dun really noe but im sure he did have food poisening just dun noe when but ohwell |
|
|
|
Post by Elle on Jan 7, 2004 22:25:28 GMT 10
Whether he was sick or not, nervous or not (sorry Guy), he sang that arrangement of "What a Wonderful World" brilliantly at WI.
|
|
|
|
Post by Swizel on Jan 8, 2004 0:26:20 GMT 10
Whether he was sick or not, nervous or not (sorry Guy), he sang that arrangement of "What a Wonderful World" brilliantly at WI. is that why he got such a high place? |
|
|
|
Post by Chicagoholic on Jan 8, 2004 0:35:33 GMT 10
A lot of factors influenced the voting. Just because he didn't rank highly, it doesn't mean his performance wasn't great.
|
|
|
|
Post by Swizel on Jan 8, 2004 0:53:03 GMT 10
his performance was good, not great..personally Diana and Heinz were my top choices. |
|
pyst
Shower Crooner
Posts: 29
|
Post by pyst on Jan 8, 2004 16:12:02 GMT 10
well swizzle, I should certainly try to respect your choices and I'll try to do that - as if you care.  But.....it certainly gives us some indication as to why you don't agree with some of us preferring guy. Diana & Heinz were both fine singers, nothing much to dispute there but I guess we see that something extra in Guy that you may see in your 'idols' that we don't. |
|
|
|
Post by sinisterangel on Jan 8, 2004 16:15:10 GMT 10
but do ne of u's noe when he actually got food poisening?? coz as i sed earlier it was either before or after the performance.  |
|
|
|
Post by beautiful friend on Jan 8, 2004 16:24:45 GMT 10
New Weekly article said that it was after "the night before he was reunited with family and friends " i would guess that was when he came back for the carols |
|
|
|
Post by sinisterangel on Jan 8, 2004 16:31:54 GMT 10
he was great at the carols as well!! i guess it happened after the performance then.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pinkline Jones on Jan 8, 2004 16:32:58 GMT 10
Swizel,
Heinz was ok but how about the guy who lost out to him from South Africa - might've been robbed if the precious few seconds of footage was anything to go by.
PINKLINE
|
|
|
|
Post by Mantastic Plastic on Jan 8, 2004 17:28:11 GMT 10
his performance was good, not great..personally Diana and Heinz were my top choices. Heinz??? Is there something you need to tell us Swizel... |
|
i dunno if its true but it says it in a lot of magazines aswell...... poor guy and if its true den dats wierd coz he performed perfectly well.
