|
Post by angel01 on Nov 8, 2003 15:03:09 GMT 10
You contradicted yourself because when you said "he should burn" and I asked "for the job he does?" you said "no, for encouraging him" and I said "but that's what he was employed to do". Being employed to do something would make it a job and that's where you have a contradiction. I would not say I'm a "Mark lover" as you put it. I just beleive that there are to sides to every story and no one seemed willing to voice the other side, so I did. I also beleive that poeple are being to harsh on someone they've never meet. You don't know the full story, don't be to quick to judge.
|
|
|
Post by MaxiZoomDweebie on Nov 11, 2003 12:59:31 GMT 10
Really, who cares? The way I interpreted those three posts were: he was employed to encourage David Hasselhoff to sing, and I didn't like that. I also don't give a toss if Hasselhoff employed him or not. That is not a contradiction. It is simply the way I interpreted it. 'Burn' is a figure of speech, not that I actually want him to burn. I suggest you shouldn't take a two-sentence post so figuratively and seriously. It's certainly not the worst thing that's been written down on these boards either - why don't you go argue with the ten million other people who have called him an 'ugly, moronic, sleazy arsehole etc'. I don't care if I know the full story. I've seen him every week and that is enough. You don't know him either. And for the record - I don't 'hate' Mark. I do, however, hate David Hasselhoff's music.
|
|
|
Post by MaxiZoomDweebie on Nov 11, 2003 13:12:42 GMT 10
That would be literally, not figuratively...that makes more sense now doesn't it...
|
|
|
Post by angel01 on Nov 11, 2003 15:37:45 GMT 10
and do you also beleive that ignorance no sorry arrogance is bliss? I don't like hasselhoff either. The difference is i chose to blame David hasselhoff for it and not mark holden
|
|